What does Sartre say about free will?

Architects of our essence

By Shawn Buckles

Discover how Jean-Paul Sartre revolutionized our grasp of free will, teaching that your every choice carves your destiny, free from fate's design.

Sartre believed in absolute free will, arguing that humans are "condemned to be free" and bear the responsibility for their choices and actions, without the influence of God or inherent essence.

Man is condemned to be free; because once thrown into the world, he is responsible for everything he does. It is up to you to give [life] a meaning.
Jean-Paul Sartre
Freedom is what we do with what is done to us.
Jean-Paul Sartre
We are our choices.
Jean-Paul Sartre

Summary

  • Sartre's existentialism highlights the responsibility accompanying human freedom.
  • Individuals define their essence through choices, shaping their identity and destiny.
  • Free will is fundamental to Sartre's interpretation of the human condition and ethics.

Sartre mentions free will in the following books:

  • Being and Nothingness (1943): This foundational existentialist work delves into the concept of free will through the lens of existential psychology, arguing for the individual's inherent freedom and responsibility in creating meaning in an absurd world.

  • Existentialism is a Humanism (1946): A clear and accessible lecture where Sartre defends existentialism against its critics, emphasizing the role of personal choice and the responsibility of individuals to shape their essence through actions.

  • No Exit (1944): A play that encapsulates Sartre's famous phrase "Hell is other people," exploring the idea of freedom and self-deception within the confines of interpersonal relationships.

Sartre's Philosophy of Existentialism

Jean-Paul Sartre's existentialist philosophy is a cornerstone of twentieth-century thought, with a strong emphasis on the primacy of individual existence over abstract essence. His ideas challenge the traditional views on human essence and the nature of being.

Existentialism and Human Essence

Sartre contends that humans are fundamentally different from objects or other beings due to the presence of consciousness. In his view, essence—the nature or defining characteristics—of humans is not something predetermined at birth. Sartre famously stated that humans are “condemned to be free,” meaning that they are thrown into existence without a predetermined nature and must define themselves through their choices.

Existence Precedes Essence

Central to Sartrean existentialism is the declaration that existence precedes essence. For Sartre, this means that a person first exists, encounters themselves in a world among others, and, throughout their life, defines their essence through actions. Rather than adhering to a universal human essence, each individual’s choices and actions contribute to what their essence will be, emphasizing the significance of personal responsibility and freedom.

Freedom and Human Condition

Jean-Paul Sartre's existential philosophy posits that individuals must navigate the terrains of freedom and its inherent responsibilities. He articulates this through concepts of "condemned to be free," the accountability tied to this freedom, and the associated emotional experiences.

Condemned to be Free

For Sartre, to be "condemned to be free" means that humans are thrust into existence without a predefined purpose and must create their own essence through choices. Since there is no external design dictating our actions, every choice is a reflection of our freedom. He argues that the absence of a creator leaves humans with total freedom, but this also places the burden of total responsibility for those choices squarely on their shoulders.

Freedom and Responsibility

With the assertion of total freedom, there comes an inescapable weight of responsibility. Sartre maintains that individuals cannot escape the responsibility of their freedom as every choice contributes to defining one's identity. Human freedom is not just a potential; it is an action, a dynamic force, which puts power into our hands but demands conscientious decision-making in all situations.

Anguish of Freedom

The anguish of freedom emerges from the realization of its boundlessness and the solitude in choice-making. When individuals comprehend the full extent of their freedom and the sole accountability for their choices, they experience existential angst. This anguish is a normal response to understanding that one's decisions shape not just their life but also influence the world at large.

The Concept of Bad Faith

Jean-Paul Sartre’s existential philosophy reveals that many people deny their inherent freedom through a mechanism he termed "bad faith". This concept involves self-deception and the evasion of the truth of one's freedom and responsibility.

Avoiding Freedom

Individuals often escape acknowledging their freedom to choose by blaming their actions on external circumstances or social roles. Sartre illustrates this evasion by discussing how a waiter might over-identify with his job role, thereby denying his freedom to choose beyond that identity. By adopting a role to the point where it seems like there's no choice left, individuals are in bad faith.

Self-Deception and Authenticity

Bad faith also relates to self-deception—the act of lying to oneself to avoid the anxiety that comes with freedom. Sartre encourages living in authenticity, which demands acknowledgment of one's freedom and the responsibility that accompanies it. Authentic existence involves acting in a manner that fully accepts one's freedom and the continuous project of defining the self.

Existential Choice and Action

Jean-Paul Sartre, a principal proponent of Existentialism, asserts that human beings are defined by their actions and the choices they make. They craft their own essence through these choices, which are acts of free will, inevitably facing the weight of their implications and the future they shape.

Making Choices

Choices are central to Sartre's philosophy; he believes that people are fundamentally free to make their own decisions. This freedom means that one is not just choosing for oneself, but through their actions, they're setting an example for others indicating what they believe an individual should be like. For Sartre, when a person makes a choice, they are fully responsible for it, and this freedom is a form of what he calls "condemnation," because one must choose—there is no escape from choice, even in choosing not to decide.

Consequences of Choices

With every choice comes consequences. According to Sartre, when individuals make choices they are also projecting into the future, considering the potential ramifications of their actions. The burden of this responsibility can be immense as it involves predicting outcomes and living with the results of their action or inaction. The consequences do not only affect the chooser but can extend to others, which is why Sartre highlights the profound responsibility associated with choice.

Human Agency and Projects

Sartre places great emphasis on human agency—the capability individuals have to act independently and make free choices. He argues that people engage in "projects," which are the pursuits and goals they set for themselves, shaping their future in accordance with their chosen values. By asserting agency, they define their purpose and direction, essentially creating their own life's meaning. This process is a profound assertion of freedom, demonstrating Sartre's belief in the inherent ability of people to shape their own destiny through action and choice.

Influence of Existentialism

Existentialism, with its core focus on individual freedom and decision-making, has left an indelible mark on various cultural and intellectual domains. Sartre's philosophy especially underscored the inherent power and responsibility each person has in shaping their own existence.

Impact on Literature

Literary works have been deeply influenced by existentialist themes, often exploring the angst and liberation associated with individual choice. Jean-Paul Sartre and Simone de Beauvoir were not just philosophers but also novelists who embedded existential ideas into their stories. Sartre's novels frequently dissect the complexities of freedom and the weight of choice, as seen in "Nausea" and the play "No Exit". Beauvoir's works, like "The Second Sex", challenge readers to confront the societal constructs that limit personal freedom. Additionally, Albert Camus, often associated with both existentialism and the absurd, wrote "The Stranger" and "The Myth of Sisyphus", which underscore the tension between human desire for meaning and the indifferent world.

Existentialism in Modern Thought

In modern philosophy and thought, existentialism has continued to emphasize the role of individual choice amidst an often ambiguous or irrational world. Sartre's seminal lecture “Existentialism is a Humanism" underscores existentialism's cornerstone belief in mankind's freedom to craft meaning in life. This viewpoint bolstered the broader movement of humanism, stressing the value of human agency and rationality. Existentialism's insistence on personal freedom and authenticity has extended its impact further into the realms of psychology, ethics, and even political thought, proposing that freedom is a starting point for human existence.

Critiques and Misinterpretations

While exploring Sartre's views on free will, it's essential to understand the common critiques and misinterpretations that have arisen. These can stem from misunderstandings of existentialism or scholarly criticism.

Misunderstandings of Existentialism

Jean-Paul Sartre's existentialism has been subject to various misinterpretations. Some critics have mistakenly conflated existentialism with nihilism, presuming that existential freedom negates all inherent meaning or value in life. However, Sartre's philosophy asserts that individuals create their essence through choices, rather than existing without purpose. Furthermore, misunderstandings often arise regarding his stance on human nature. Sartre suggests that "existence precedes essence," meaning that humans first exist and then define themselves, which contrasts sharply with the Marxist view that social and economic factors shape human nature.

Sartre's Response to Critics

In response to his critics, Sartre clarified his positions with eloquence and depth. Confronting claims of existentialism encouraging quietism, he argued that acknowledging the absence of a predefined human nature does not absolve one of responsibility but rather amplifies it, as people must choose and act without a given template. Sartre also addressed critiques suggesting existentialism contradicts communal values or faith. He underlined that accepting existential freedom does not reject the importance of social interdependence or faith's role in individual lives but empowers personal responsibility in these domains.

Sartre's Legacy and Influence

Jean-Paul Sartre, the eminent French philosopher, left a profound impact on various fields with his existentialist ideas. His most recognized philosophical work, Being and Nothingness, played a pivotal role in shaping existential psychoanalysis. In it, Sartre explores the human condition and individual freedom, presenting a detailed framework on how people come to define their essence through their choices.

His theory of existential psychoanalysis proposes that humans are not shaped solely by their past, but rather by their future projects and the freedom of choice they possess. Sartre's work emphasizes the importance of personal responsibility and the inherent freedom of the individual to shape their own destiny, despite any facticity or inherent constraints.

Sartre also addressed the notion of self in his work Transcendence of the Ego, suggesting that the ego is not the deep-seated source of personal identity but is instead constructed by the conscious experience. This idea influenced not only philosophy but also psychology, inspiring therapists to consider the role of personal freedom and responsibility in mental health.

Beyond the realms of philosophy and psychology, Sartre's views on freedom had an influential role in political thought and activism. He espoused the belief that individuals have the power to enact social change, thereby influencing a generation of thinkers and activists who sought to challenge the status quo and promote social reform.

Overall, Sartre's legacy is characterized by his relentless exploration of freedom, responsibility, and the human condition, ensuring his continued influence in philosophy and beyond.

End of content

No more pages to load